General Group Meeting

November 29, 2010 - 12:30PM

Working on and compiling paper
Reading midterm remarks/suggestions for paper and editing
Discussed plan for finishing paper, basic edits left

Meeting with Robert Heard

November 17, 2010 - 2:00PM

Estimate for economics of turbine and boiler, as long as your are close
Use weight of turbines
Email Jeff Hawke
Sensitivity report - look at prices how will alloying elements change/Properties analysis

Meeting with Seetharaman

November 17, 2010 - 1:30PM

Discussed economic report problems - email problems to professor so he can email to DOE and Pete Rozelle for help
Discussed emission taxes and IGCC vs PC

Group Meeting

November 10, 2010 - 1:30PM

Created task list for remainder of semester:


Meeting with Robert Heard

November 3, 2010 - 2:00PM

Reviewed paper went over revisions
Discussed final presentation requirements
10 minutes, 5 min questions
Get updated report by Thanksgiving

General Group Meeting

October 25, 2010 - 1:30PM

Finished and compiled parts of the paper so far
Wrote mission statement, executive summary, table of content, list of figures, figures, conclusion and assessment, organized references


General Group Meeting

October 11, 2010 - 1:30 PM

Agenda:
Create skeleton for selection process

Creep
Almost Complete

Weldability
Simplify—one word, if not quantitative

Machinability
Dersh will find as much info as possible
Ask Chris to help fill in the blanks

Oxidation
Ranked
Put into 10-point rating system


Material Selection Process
(recorded by Kelly)

To Do:
Jonathan Matusky
AD 700
Costs
Creep
Economic Analysis (next week)

Justin Dersh
Weldability
Machinability
Economic Analysis (next week)

Brianne Burton
Yeild Strength
% Elongation
Selection Model
AD 700

Kelly Collier
Oxidation
Fatigue
Compositions


Phone Conference with Jeff Hawke - NETL

September 29, 2010 - 1:30 PM

Literature search incomplete - AD700 project, turbine operation at 700C
Life expectancy of turbine components: 250,000 hours, about 30 years

Materials Selection Criteria:
  1. Creep - Larson Miller Parameter: tested at 100 MPa for 100,000 hours at operation T
  2. Developed technology
  3. Manufacturing ability
    1. Moving components = forged. ex. HP rotor; 80K lb casting and 40-42 in diameter - not possible with Ni based alloy
    2. Stationary component = cast. Can't air cast Ni, can't cast >100 kg.
  4. Inspectability for defects minimum detectable flaw identification using ultrasonic.
  5. Tensile strength --> yield strength
  6. Impact strength (steel) or fracture toughness (nickel based)
  7. Patent licensing - only supplied by 1 company, $ and capability issues
  8. Fatigue - thermal, low cycle (casting, big components)
  9. Physical properties - thermal expansion (pieces in contact need to match), thermal conductivity, modulus, poisson's ratio
  10. Weldable - everything is welded, so can't use gas turbine materials (low life expectancy). Important for crack removal - grind down and weld overlay.

Next Steps:
  • Learn Classes of Ni Alloys, composition, strengthening phase (science direct, patents)
    • 617 - solid solution strengthened - lacks high yield strength
    • 718 - Ni super alloy - particle strengthened, high yield, not usable for high T
    • Nimonic 105 - particle strengthened, better than 718
  • Look up data sheets for properties
    • Haynes
    • Nimonic
    • Carpenter
    • Special Metals
  • Ni @ 700C typically a composite bc $
  • gamma prime strengthened materials more expensive than solid solution
  • Possible - composite rotor:
    • Beginning (1400F) -weld- Middle (1200F) -weld- End (1000F)


Meeting with Robert Heard

September 20, 2010 - 1:30PM

If we can't get numbers, we should make educated guesses
Look at the improvement of the materials over years and extrapolate the data

Meeting with Chris Roberts

September 20, 2010 - 2:00PM


Casing is a static property
creep/oxidation/fatigue/cost/welding are important factors
bolts are external, welding of sections of rotor together and you can change materials throughout

Meeting with Seetheraman

September 20, 2010 - 2:00PM

Professor will contact Morgantown NETL about a visit

General Group Meeting

September 20, 2010 - 1:30PM


Presented our research sections to each other
Things to do:
· Talk to Chris about our understanding of turbine design
o Turbine Constructiono Welds vs bolts
· Begin populating a materials selection grid
o Jono will create template – google doc
· Contact Seetharaman
o Meeting Wed.o Meeting with NETL

Independent Research
· What’s bolted?· What’s welded?· What is welding?· What is forge casting?
Populate Chart!

Meeting with Robert Heard


September 15, 2:00 pm


Start to look at this project from a business point of view
Cartech supplies the materials to turbine companies
Sell the most material you can

Focus in on what Cartech wants. What materials are going to make the most impact/money
What are they shooting for?
Focus on one place where we can make a change
They want to focus on one area where they can make a difference

Come up with a methodology for the decision making (performance index, etc.)
Designing a methodology for the selection of a turbine material

Meeting with Chris Roberts

September 15, 2:30 pm


Define property requirements for materials within the turbine
High pressure, medium pressure, low pressure sections
For each section of turbine, which properties are most important

Cartech could focus on discs and blades
Casing, may or may not be of interest

NETL, EPRI, Oakridge

Look for AUSC! just USC is not always the right operating conditions
Immature technology. 10-15 years down the road

The group decided to use Celsius and mpa 760C=1400F



General Group Meeting

September 13, 2010 - 1:30PM


Agenda:
Form Gantt chart

By Wednesday: Bri - schedule phone conference with NETL guy
Kelly – ask Seetharaman about getting ASME articles
Jono – Update WBS

By Saturday: thorough write up summarizing topic area
Identify areas of specific materials research



General Group Meeting

September 9, 2010 - 9PM

Turbines picked as the direction of the project officially
Kelly presented research recommendations from Pete Rozelle
Kelly well be DOE contact and Bri will be NETL contact
Number the annotated bibliography and say where it's from -MLA format and 2 sentence summary

Rssearch Topics:
Jono: Steam
Justin : Newest Technology and USC development
Bri : Turbine Fundamentals
Kelly : Old Power Plants

Construct ghantt chart soon
Jono in charge of WBS updating as well as scheduling




Phone Conference with Pete Rozelle from DOE

September 9, 2010 - 10:30AM


Research Recommendations:
1) Understand fundamentals of turbines
2) Understand fundamentals of steam conditions
3) Rationale behind design of 1950s power plants, particularly Eddystone Plant
4) Newest technology and state of the art research on ultra supercritical coal power plants

Resources:
DOE website
ASME publications
American Power Conference proceedings



Meeting with Robert Heard

September 7, 2010 - 2:00PM

Goal of project?
Coal power plants. To make more efficient, operate at higher temperatures, need better materials. Leaning towards turbines.
Should choose based on what company needs
Experimentation?
Collect data from other sources (can’t do test ourselves)
Need to develop some sort of analysis to put data to the test—validation method
Decision tree or something
WBS will change as the project progresses
Put timetables on tasks when we talk to Chris



Meeting with Sridhar Seetheraman

September 7, 2010 - 2:30PM Meeting

Project summary
Turbine vs Boiler
Turbine
Critical aspect—is there a material that costs too much or doesn’t work?
Would we want to look at what is being done or what could be done in the future (especially for economic analysis)?
Is there a material that could work?
NETL contacts?
Has a turbines project in Pittsburgh—Seetharaman will arrange
DOE turbine headquarters contact as well
Efficiency saves money and carbon emission
What would the carbon tax have to be to make it worth it?
Use environmental economics to solve
Corrosion issues: chromium or aluminum alloys or adding a coating


General Group Meeting

September 6, 2010 - 1:30PM

Discussion of boiler vs turbine:
  • boiler information is harder to find while turbine structure, information, and data are well defined
  • can more easily find size, weight, material prices for turbine components
  • industry reps are more willing to talk about turbines
Our project will have one focus, however in the end we want do an economic analysis of replacing material for the entire plant. This will require us to look at the boiler even though we have chosen to focus on the turbine. This type of analysis will require us to make assumptions about the boiler and all other aspects of the plant.

Power plant visit:
  • NETL - operates out of Pittsburgh, Morgantown, and Albany
  • Siemens - natural gas turbines
  • Contact: Paul Ohodnicki about local plant visit (NETL)
  • Ideal visit when the plant is shut down so we can see the boiler
  • Have questions ready for representative (what materials they do/do not like to work with, welding, etc.)
Economic Analysis Model:
  • Initial cost of remodeling power plant plus lifetime costs need to be considered
  • Lifetime considerations: runtime (days/year), emission reductions after remodel
What is expected for next meeting:
  • All: literature bibliographies by Wednesday
  • Kelly: email Paul Ohodnicki about plant visit
  • All: be ready to discuss WBS with Prof. Heard and Prof. Seetheraman on Wednesday



General Group Meeting

September 4, 2010 - 12:30 PM

Kelly and Bri need to join the wikipage
Created and discussed the work breakdown schedule
Figured out how to embed calendar on the wikipage

Responsibilities for remainder of project:
  • Justin - Edit and update wiki and keep formatting the same
  • Jono - Calendar updates
  • Rotating meeting minutes among group members - bri, jono, justin, kelly
  • Minutes taker responsible for updating wiki and establishing what is expected for next meeting
What is expected for next meeting:
  • Finish reading all documents and summarize them on the wiki by Wednesday





Conference Call with Chris Roberts

September 2, 2010 - 1:30PM
Schedule Specifics
  • Meeting on Monday with Chris in person to discuss gantt chart and WBS
  • Will do research and choose direction of project by this meeting
  • Setup weekly conference call times with Chris set at 2:30PM on Wednesdays
Project Specifics
For the past 15 years there has been great amount of research into power generation as infastructure of old plants may fail as demand for power continues to increase
Some plants have been around for 50+ years and are in need of upgrading to get more out of the fuels being used.
  1. subcritical -60's
  2. supercritical - late 70's
  3. advanced ultra-super critical - now - need for materials to withstand 1400F and 35MPa
Look at components for boiler section and account for heat generation, also can look at steam turbines which do the electricity generation put on the grid
Project is generally Boiler vs Turbine - we choose the dierction
Boiler would entail conditions outside of the pipe vs inside of the pipe, by products of combustion, and coatings hot zones, etc. - more challenging
What are the property requirements? find materials to meet these requirements. Support with experimental data/research
What is the cost of these new materials/alloys? best properties vs lowest cost

WBS and gantt chart:
project is an open literature project - we need to have structure and order to what we research
contact companies for oxidation and mechanical data of alloys

In the end we would like to recommend a material with economics considered or propose new novel techniques


General Group Meeting

September 1, 2010 - 4:00PM

Schedule Specifics

  • Contact Chris for alloy specific side of project
  • Set up weekly meetings at 1:30PM on Wednesdays with faculty advisor

Project Specifics

Generally as you increase operating temperature of power plans, you increase efficiencyCO2 emissions is very important - look at tax, economic factors as these are big concerns todayLook into alternative fuels being used such as oxyfuel which combusts with pure oxygen so that separation of nitrogen after the fact is not necessary
  • operating temps must be able to go up to 1700 from ~1400 for this to happen and the materials now simply cannot take this heat
  • steam can also have corrosive effects
Find materials or composites (metals with ceramics?) that may be able to withstand these difficultiesLook into thermal barrier coatings to help protect from heatMaybe do a life cycle analysisLook into State of the Art technology and look at advantages and disadvantages of this technology